HQ COURSES STORE PRICING ABOUT
  • Andrew Kramer
    16
    I've got about 1750 races in my own data set, and I calculated that the lowest-odds horse wins only around 23% of the time. My data set goes back to last July and has races only at major tracks on Th, FR, Sa, Sun, no 2yr races, ge 6 horses, and no races with >1 FTS.

    I had thought that the post-time favorite wins around 35-40% of the time. So I'm going back over my data set to see if I made a mistake in its construction.

    Can anyone shed light on the % of favorites winning?

    Thanks!!!
  • Dave Schwartz
    435
    Your data is wrong.
    Current hit rate on Favs is 37.9%.

    It is DOWN from 4th quarter last year, by ~4%.


    This is 2026 data.
    (5 days behind)

    1-rPubChWIN BETS
    Field1 Field2  Starts   Pays    Pct   $Net     IV    PIV  AvPay AvOdds AvPubC
    1st             3,609  1,368   37.9  $1.69   2.78   1.05  $4.46   1.23   1.00
    2nd             3,507    768   21.9  $1.70   1.60   1.04  $7.75   2.84   2.00
    3rd             3,510    504   14.4  $1.60   1.05   0.98 $11.17   4.51   3.00
    FH              5,697    495    8.7  $1.51   0.73   0.96 $17.41   7.93   4.60
    RH             10,902    394    3.6  $1.40   0.28   0.87 $38.68  18.42   6.90
    
    Total          27,225  3,529   13.0  $1.53   1.00   0.97
    
  • Andrew Kramer
    16
    O.K. Thanks. I'll go back and check what might have gone wrong.
  • Gillycapper
    44
    Hi Andrew, I was going to say that even if the favorites are down, it wouldn't laffect the number Dave gave us above by much. maybe going from 37.9 down to 37.2.
  • Dave Schwartz
    435
    Hi Andrew, I was going to say that even if the favorites are down, it wouldn't laffect the number Dave gave us above by much. maybe going from 37.9 down to 37.2.Gillycapper

    Actually, looking at the last quarter of 2025, Favs hit 44% - glad to see that has subsided a little.

    But the reason for 2026 changes appears to be a single, dominant Whale team having moving their bets from Favs to 2nd choices.
  • Dio
    19
    You could argue that the Whale's bets are clearly AI-driven and lack human intervention, such as trips, track bias, angles, and trainer stats. Maybe I should consider taking advantage of that. They win by trying to break even, betting on obvious horses, usually favorites, and subsidizing rebates to make a profit. Unfortunately, a lot of us don't have those resources, and this approach doesn't work for us. They clearly don't handicap races thoroughly and rarely hit a mutual that's considerable. Trying to zig when the whales are zagging is definitely the way to handicap. But this handicapping approach lacks several human elements that I think we should exploit. FYI, Joe Public is just as big as the whales.
  • Dave Schwartz
    435


    Actually, they do not use AI.
    The use Iterative Regression.

    That's why we've got such an edge.
  • Dio
    19
    Hello Dave,

    Thanks for the quick response. Is that algorithmic?
  • Dio
    19
    Thanks, Dave

    I've always been curious about that. Unfortunately, not something I would understand. BTW, I'm guessing it's 5:00 AM there. Get a life!!
  • Dave Schwartz
    435
    I've always been curious about that. Unfortunately, not something I would understand. BTW, I'm guessing it's 5:00 AM there. Get a life!!Dio

    LOL
    In bed at 8:30 and works well.

    But "get a life" is a really cool idea.
    :wink:
  • Andrew Kramer
    16
    My hunch is that the whales throw in everything, including the kitchen sink, and run a logistic regression model. Their aim is to have (my guess) a 0-2% ROI. But with a 10% rebate, their true ROI is 10-12%. That may not sound like much (my models are way better, but I can't wager 200k per race), but if they play something like 80 races per day at 200k per race, that's a return of $160k PER DAY.
  • Dave Schwartz
    435
    My hunch is that the whales throw in everything, including the kitchen sink, and run a logistic regression model. Their aim is to have (my guess) a 0-2% ROI. But with a 10% rebate, their true ROI is 10-12%. That may not sound like much (my models are way better, but I can't wager 200k per race), but if they play something like 80 races per day at 200k per race, that's a return of $160k PER DAY.Andrew Kramer


    The recognized Whale business model has been LOSE 3.5% per wagered dollar.

    There is an old Whale axiom: "If you're making a flat profit, you aren't betting enough."
  • Andrew Kramer
    16
    Then they're going totally off the large rebate they get.
  • Dave Schwartz
    435
    Then they're going totally off the large rebate they get.Andrew Kramer

    Yes, that's how it works.
    It's also how I arrived at the idea of using the hedge horses for hit rate knowing I couldn't make a profit.
  • Dio
    19
    Thanks, guys, great stuff. No wonder some people believe that whales might bring racing to an end.

    So, let me get this straight.

    1. Whales win on rebates.
    2. ADW's pay for the signal and win on the percentage of takeout.
    3. Tracks sell the signal and win on the percentage of takeout.

    LOL... there's room for us on this list.
  • Dave Schwartz
    435
    1. Whales win on rebates.
    2. ADW's pay for the signal and win on the percentage of takeout.
    3. Tracks sell the signal and win on the percentage of takeout.

    LOL... there's room for us on this list.
    Dio

    Dio,

    They can't stop us because we've CALIBRATED THEM!

    Just make sure that you don't miss this seminar!
    https://www.community.horsestreet.com/discussion/1244/get-you-winning-seminar-part-1-march-25/p1
  • Dio
    19
    Will do!
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment